BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION MOMENTUM CRT-D; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER, WITH CRT-D
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number G125 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Death (1802); Unspecified Infection (1930); Staphylococcus Aureus (2058); Fluid Discharge (2686); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 04/13/2020 |
Event Type
Death
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was part of a system revision due to infection.Reportedly, the patient was presenting with one week of bloody, non-purulent discharge and 1-2 cm defect in skin overlying the pacemaker.Initially, there was concern for right ventricular (rv) lead mass, however no valvular or lead vegetation was noted.Moreover, the patient had methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) infection.The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics.There were no additional adverse patient effects reported.The crt-d was explanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient code 3191 captures the reportable event of surgery and the additional intervention treatment with the use of intravenous antibiotics.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was explanted due to infection.Following treatment with intravenous antibiotics, the patient was afebrile, hemodynamically stable, without leukocytosis, and without signs of systemic infection.No vegetation was found on the right ventricular lead.The right ventricular (rv) lead, right atrial (ra) lead and left ventricular (lv) lead were surgically abandoned due to high risk of lead extraction.Wound cultures showed methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa).Additional information was received indicating that the patient had expired approximately three months following the procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|