• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION 466FXXXX; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION 466FXXXX; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 466FXXXX
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Distress (2329); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 09/24/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, a patient underwent placement of an optease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.The indication for filter placement is not available.The filter subsequently malfunctioned including, but not limited to, physical and emotional damages from tilting of the filter and the resultant symptoms.The filter remains implanted; thus, unavailable for analysis.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without procedural films for review, the filter tilt reported could not be confirmed.Additionally, the timing and mechanism of the filter tilt is unknown.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with the anatomy of the vessel, specifically asymmetry and tortuousness.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Without procedural films or images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported in the legal brief, a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient, including, but not limited to, physical and emotional damages from tilting of the filter and the resultant symptoms.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, distress and other damages.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused tilting of the filter and the resultant symptoms.The patient also reported, in addition to filter tilt, numbness in the extremities, back pain, internal discomfort and anxiety related to the filter.Approximately eleven years post implant, the patient underwent an abdominal computerized tomography (ct) scan indicated for filter evaluation.The scan identified a cordis optease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter tilted 12 degrees.The apex of the filter touches the ivc wall and it is less than 2cm below the most inferior renal vein.The ivc filter does not perforate the inferior vena cava.No fractured or bent struts were noted and no significant inferior stenosis was identified.The indication for the filter implant, operative record and medical history have no been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without the procedural films and the limited information provided, the report of tilt could not be confirmed or further clarified.Additionally, the timing and mechanism of the filter tilt is unknown.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with operator technique, vessel characteristics, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Due to the nature of the complaint the reported numbness of the extremities and back pain could not be further clarified.Pain, numbness and anxiety do not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues.Given the limited information currently available for review, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported in the legal brief, a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient, including, but not limited to, physical and emotional damages from tilting of the filter and the resultant symptoms.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, distress and other damages.Approximately eleven years after the filter was implanted, the patient underwent an abdominal computerized tomography (ct) scan indicated for filter evaluation.The scan identified a cordis optease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter tilted 12 degrees.The apex of the filter touches the ivc wall and it is less than 2cm below the most inferior renal vein.The ivc filter does not perforate the inferior vena cava.No fractured or bent struts were noted and no significant inferior stenosis was identified.According to the information received in the patient profile form (ppf), the patient reports tilting of the filter, numbness in the extremities, back pain, internal discomfort and further experienced anxiety related to the filter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
466FXXXX
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes FL 33014 2802
MDR Report Key10641416
MDR Text Key210370873
Report Number1016427-2020-04429
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K034050
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/07/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number466FXXXX
Device Catalogue Number466FXXXX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/20/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-