• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK; RIGID ENDOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK; RIGID ENDOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number 242018
Device Problem Poor Quality Image (1408)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/15/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).To date, the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date, a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Udi:(b)(4).
 
Event Description
As reported by the facility via email, they were unable to see with the scope.Another scope was brought in to complete the procedure with no delay, and no patient harm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device was received and evaluated at the service center.The reported complaint that the scope had poor visibility was confirmed.The following defects were found during evaluation : optical system, optical components broken lenses in optic system outer tube damaged, distal tip distal tip damaged distal tips has deposit.The device was diagnosed and repaired using spare parts and was tested and found to be working according to specifications.The damage to the outer tube and the broken lenses are most likely a result of user mishandling of the device or a possible fall.Improper cleaning / maintenance is the root cause of the deposits on the distal tip.Also the damage to the distal tip is most likely a result of user mishandling of the device or user error during a surgical procedure.The service history has been reviewed in lieu of the device history record for this device since it was previously serviced.The device was last serviced on 10/14/2019 and passed all functional testing before being returned to the customer.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9: the date device returned to manufacturer has been updated to reflect the correct information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [1365285] number, and no non-conformances were identified d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Correction: the serial number has been updated to reflect the correct information.Udi:(b)(4).Additional information: the expiration date was reported as unknown on the initial report.It has been updated as 10/10/2020.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK
Type of Device
RIGID ENDOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
MDR Report Key10657796
MDR Text Key210680588
Report Number1221934-2020-02944
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705029150
UDI-Public10886705029150
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K080560
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/23/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/10/2020
Device Model Number242018
Device Catalogue Number242018
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/17/2020
Date Manufacturer Received12/16/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-