• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP - SUPERDIMENSION INC SUPERDIMENSION; SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP - SUPERDIMENSION INC SUPERDIMENSION; SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED Back to Search Results
Model Number AAS00161-12
Device Problems Defective Device (2588); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Application Program Problem (2880)
Patient Problems No Code Available (3191); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 09/23/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) out of an abundance of caution, superdimension is filing this mdr due to the additional risk associated with multiple exposures to general anesthesia.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during procedure the pst is not sensing properly.The site has received the cable and replaced them but the system still down and shows that the lb to be connected, but the pst and lg are out of sensing volume.The patient was under anesthesia.The physician was not able to complete the enb portion of the case and was not completed by other means.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the unit had a discrete component failure.It was reported that the patient procedure was cancelled or aborted due to a system issue and the system console did not function properly.The reported issues were confirmed.The most likely cause was traced to a component failure.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the unit had connectivity issues.It was reported that the patient procedure was cancelled or aborted due to a system issue.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.It was also reported that the system console did not function properly.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause was traced to a component failure.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d8, g3 correction: g1(manufacturer name), h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the lss had no physical damage or physical defect.Functionally, the lss was connected to a qualified console system to test the functionality of the device.Cables were connected; however, local registration could not be performed due to the lss was not able to show pst sensors in sensing volume as noted.It was reported that the patient procedure was cancelled or aborted due to a system issue.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.It was also reported that system displays error message indicating lg or pst is outside the magnetic volume, and there was an issue with one or more of the patient sensor triplets (pst's).The reported issues were confirmed.The most likely cause was traced to a component failure.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERDIMENSION
Type of Device
SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP - SUPERDIMENSION INC
161 cheshire lane, suite 100
plymouth MN 55441
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP - SUPERDIMENSION INC
161 cheshire lane, suite 100
plymouth MN 55441
Manufacturer Contact
amy beeman
161 cheshire lane, suite 100
minneapolis, MN 55441
7632104064
MDR Report Key10684574
MDR Text Key211505212
Report Number3004962788-2020-00061
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JAK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K092365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAAS00161-12
Device Catalogue NumberAAS00161-12
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/25/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight51 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-