No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcomes associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence, adhesions and surgical intervention.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists adhesions and hernia recurrence as possible complications.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
Attorney alleges that on or about (b)(6) 2008, the patient underwent surgery for repair of an incisional hernia.A composix kugel patch was implanted to repair the hernia defect.It is alleged that on or about (b)(6) 2011, the patient underwent additional surgery to repair a massive ventral hernia during this procedure the composix kugel patch was found to be bunched up and it was found that the patient's small intestine had become imbedded to the undersurface of the mesh.The composix kugel patch was partially dissected and a non-bard davol mesh was implanted to repair the defect.It is alleged that the patient was injured severely and permanently.The patient suffered pain, disability, hospitalizations and additional surgeries.It is also alleged that the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer physical pain, chronic pain, mental anguish, psychological stress, depression, has undergone and will likely require medical treatments and other forms of care.Attorney also alleges that the device was defective.
|