|
Model Number 04.013.046 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/ investigation.Reporter is jnj representative.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part number: 04.013.046, lot number: 11l1938, part manufacture date: jul 01, 2019, manufacturing location: (b)(4), part expiration date: n/a, nonconformance noted: n/a.Dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of spiral blade f/expert rfn l70 tan gold product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework nor nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no nonconformance noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device history review: this lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent revision surgery around 9pm to reposition the expert han nail, expert end cap, spiral blade, and three (3) locking screws.The original procedure was completed on (b)(6) 2020 in the afternoon.The surgeon originally placed the expert han nail but diagnostic imaging showed evidence that the expert han nail remained extramedullary in the mid-distal third of the tibia.This required revision surgery to carry out repositioning of the implants.There was patient consequence.This complaint involves six (6) devices.This report is for (1) spiral blade f/expert rfn l70 tan gold.This is report 5 of 6 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|