Summary of complaint investigation media review: in series 1 and 2 a severe lesion was evident in left main (lm) ostium.Pacing wires were evident in the heart.In series 3 lesion pre-dilation was carried out.When comparing the lesion before and after the pre-dilation, after pre-dilation the lesion still appeared to be severely narrowed.In series 4 the dilation balloon had been removed, and in series 5 and 6 an unexpanded stent was seen positioned across the ostial lm lesion site.In series 7 the stent was deployed, stent delivery balloon appeared fully expanded.In series 8 the stent delivery system had been removed and the deployed stent was evident in the vessel, the deployed stent was narrowed/constricted in the proximal region, conforming to the shape of the lesion.From series 9 to 14 it appeared that multiple post-dilations were carried out; what appeared to be inflated balloons were evident within the deployed stent in series 9, 12 and 14.In series 15 the balloon had been withdrawn into the guide catheter.Per the event description the procedure was completed using another stent (another manufacturers 4.0x8mm stent), while the introduction/positioning of this stent was not seen in the media one of the inflated balloon in series 9, 14 or 16 may have been the deployment of this stent.The post-dilations and/or deployment of the additional stent appeared to improve the narrowing/constriction which had been noted in the deployed stent.The final 3 series showed views of the final result, flow had been improved in the lm ostium with some narrowing and the lesion shape still evident.
|