Product evaluation: one 1.25mm hex tl,long gemloc (hxlgr1.25) was not returned for investigation as it was ingested.Since the product has not been returned, visual/functional evaluation could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available device information.Pre-existing patient conditions are not related to the reported event.However, it was noted on the per that the patient had unknown bone density and they were operating on tooth 29/30.The tool was used for an unknown duration and was reported during use.The customer did not provide pictures or evidence of the ingestion.It was reported the event happened on (b)(6) and on (b)(6)x-rays showed the device was passed by the patient.Dhr review and complaint history review could not be performed, as the lot number associated with the reported product is not available.Zimmer biomet quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product within specifications.A complaint history review by item number was conducted for the (hxlgr1.25) dating back to 12 months from now.The complaint history review revealed that there are no existing non-conformances/capa/hhe/d/ie/product holds for the reported device related to the reported event.February post market trending was reviewed and there were no actionable events or corrective actions for the reported event/failure or device.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction could not be verified and the reported event was non-verifiable as there was no objective evidence provided for the ingestion event.Sections updated: b4: date of this report.G3: date pce/investigation results were received.G6: type of report and follow up number.H2: follow up type.H3: device evaluated based on the item number provided.H6: adverse event problem codes.H10: manufacturer's narrative.
|