Model Number ROSA ONE |
Device Problems
Malposition of Device (2616); Application Program Freezes, Becomes Nonfunctional (4031)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/16/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been evaluated yet for investigation purpose.Once the evaluation is performed, a follow-up medwatch report will be submitted.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
At the end of the case, merging the ct scan and the mri and comparing the electrodes to the plan, it was found that the entry points of the electrodes were all slightly deviated from the plan.The surgeon inferred that there most likely was a merge issue, due to the fact the post-op ct did not include the entire top of the head.The surgeon was fine with placement of electrodes and the case concluded successfully, however even after the case when the company representative tried to adjust the merge, the ct and mri still could not be adjusted and entry points of the electrodes remained off by the same amount in the same direction.
|
|
Event Description
|
At the end of the case, merging the ct scan and the mri and comparing the electrodes to the plan, it was found that the entry points of the electrodes were all slightly deviated from the plan.The surgeon inferred that there most likely was a merge issue, due to the fact the post-op ct did not include the entire top of the head.The surgeon was fine with placement of electrodes and the case concluded successfully, however even after the case when the company representative tried to adjust the merge, the ct and mri still could not be adjusted and entry points of the electrodes remained off by the same amount in the same direction.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A full analysis of the data logs has been performed.This analysis concluded that the inaccuracy is confirmed for all fourteen trajectories at the entry points.The deviation analysis suggests a rotation of the head.The registration was validated with multiple use errors which could impact the registration accuracy : the exam used for the laser registration was a 3t mri which is specifically not recommended in the instructions for use as it creates distortion.All initial points were corrected on image only and not with the robot arm as specified in the instructions for use.The last point was validated with an important error detected during the verification step.Visually the point was also incorrect, thus the verification step should have been restarted.The deviations observed might be the result of an inaccurate patient registration due to the above described use errors.An inelastic movement of the head is not likely since a leksell frame was used with a leksell adaptor during the case.The analysis shows that the device behaved as expected.The final ct post-operative merged during the case does not show the entire head due to a contrast issue.The results could not be checked properly.However, the merge was attempted on manufacturing site and was successful, which permitted to complete the analysis.Corrected data: b1 report type, b4 date of this report, g4 date received by manufacturer, h2 if follow-up, what type , h3 device evaluated by manufacturer, h6 event problem and evaluation codes & h10 additional narratives/data.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|