Model Number 45007 |
Device Problem
Suction Problem (2170)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/10/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was improper aspiration.A 2.1mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure in the right superficial femoral artery (sfa).During priming, the device did not seem to be aspirating properly and had a lot of air in the system.The device was introduced into the patient and ran for 5 seconds where it still did not aspirate properly.There were no visual defects observed nor error messages displayed.A new jetstream device was used and the case was successfully completed.There were no patient complications reported and the patient was good post procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device eval by manufacturer: the jetstream device xc-2.1 was received by boston scientific for analysis.The device was visually examined for any shaft damage and the functional testing of the device was completed.The device showed a kink located 81.5cm from the tip.Functional analysis was done by completing the setup procedure per the instructions for use.The device primed and the blades rotated as designed.Aspiration testing of the device was done per the test procedure.The device is tested by using a beaker of water.The device's tip is submerged in a beaker of fluid and the device is run for a period of 1 minute.Test results showed that this device did perform as designed per the test procedure specification.Inspection of the remainder of the device revealed no damage or irregularities.The complaint was not confirmed for evacuation issues.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was improper aspiration.A 2.1mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure in the right superficial femoral artery (sfa).During priming, the device did not seem to be aspirating properly and had a lot of air in the system.The device was introduced into the patient and ran for 5 seconds where it still did not aspirate properly.There were no visual defects observed nor error messages displayed.A new jetstream device was used and the case was successfully completed.There were no patient complications reported and the patient was good post procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|