Salem mm, ravindran k, enriquez-marulanda a, et al.Pipeline embolization device versus stent-assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysm treatment: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.Neurosurgery.2020;87(3):516-522.Doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa041.Medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with a pipeline embolization device (ped).The purpose of this article was to comparatively assess the efficacy of peds and stent-assisted coiling (sac) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.One hundred seventy peds were used with 135 patients in the study.The median age was 58 (range: 49-65), and 83.5% were female.The article does not state any technical issues during use of the ped.The following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted: - 6 patients experienced ischemic complications - 5 patients experienced hemorrhagic complications - 10 instances of retreatment - 6 patients had an mrs score greater than 2 at their last follow-up (on average 11.5 months after the procedure) - 28 patients had incomplete occlusion (<(><<)>90%) of the aneurysm.
|