• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH UNKNOWN VARIAX M PLATE 3; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH UNKNOWN VARIAX M PLATE 3; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SEL
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Implant Pain (4561); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Date 11/18/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other additional information is available.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected lot number was not communicated.If any further information is provided, the investigation report will be updated.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer became aware of a pmcf published by klinikum aschaffenburg ¿ alzenau, in germany.The title of this report is ¿a post-market clinical follow-up (pmcf) of the treatment of hand and wrist fractures with the stryker hand plating system¿ which is associated with the stryker ¿ variax hand locking and profyle standard¿ system.This report includes research done on 105 patients between the period may, 2019 and april, 2020.It was not possible to ascertain specific device details or patient information from the report, or to match the events reported with previously reported complaints.Therefore, new complaints were initiated in the system for the post-operative complications mentioned in the report.This product inquiry addresses material failure with breakage of all 3 plates and significant callus formation followed by revision surgery.The report states: ¿p.18.38 was a (b)(6) man who suffered fractures to metacarpals ii, iii, and iv due to a severe blow to his right hand (ao: 77.2.2 b, 77.3.2 a, 77.4.2 a).Metacarpal ii was a i° open fracture.The treatment was carried out using one variax m stryker plate each (i.E.A total of 3) and wound debridement.The follow-up treatment was released as usual by means of free, passive physiotherapy without load for a total of 6 weeks.Because of the open fracture situation, antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime 500 mg was administered twice daily for a total of 10 days.In the course of the treatment, the patient presented with persistent complaints and swelling.An x-ray examination showed a material failure with breakage of all 3 plates and significant callus formation.A revision and renewed osteosynthesis with unknown plates were performed.100 days later, with the help of an exogenous ultrasound therapy, the patient regained complete finger extension and fist closure.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN VARIAX M PLATE 3
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
SZ  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
SZ   2545
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key11035865
MDR Text Key222294282
Report Number0008031020-2020-02572
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type study
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/18/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SEL
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/23/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-