It was reported through the litigation process, that the filter migrated to aorta, tilted, perforated into organs and struts detached.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for alleged filter migration, filter tilt, filter limb detachment and perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc) as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.H11: b3, h6(result, conclusion), h11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|