A physician reported the certas valve was implanted to a male patient via v-p shunt on an unknown date and an unknown setting.However, on an unknown date, the patient complained of headache and it was found ventricular enlargement.When the setting was attempted to be changed, it could not be changed from 3 to 1.Therefore, the valve was replaced to a new one on (b)(6) 2020.After removing the valve, it was checked its patency, and it flowed.
|
Unique device identifier (udi) : (b)(4).The certas valve was returned for evaluation: failure analysis - the position of the cam when valve was received was at setting 1.The valve was visually inspected; needle holes in the needle chamber were noted.The valve was hydrated.The valve was leak tested and only leaked from the needle hole in the needle chamber.The valve passed the test for programming, occlusion, reflux and pressure.No root cause could be determined as the technician could not confirm any problem with the valve at the time of investigation.The possible root cause for the issue reported by the customer could be due biological debris and protein buildup interfering with the valve mechanism, at the time of the investigation no occlusions/programming issues were noted.
|