|
Catalog Number 05.001.201 |
Device Problems
Noise, Audible (3273); Excessive Heating (4030)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/21/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Reporter¿s phone number was not provided.Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that the battery handpiece device was overheating and had noise.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure, or if a spare device was available for use.It was not reported if there were any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.The device was evaluated and it was determined that the reported condition was not confirmed.Therefore, the assignable root cause was not determined.However, during evaluation, it was determined that the device had a seized bearing, would not run and failed pre-test for check function of the device.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to component failure from normal wear.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|