As reported, during an unknown procedure, a performer introducer was unable to pass through the skin.The introducer was perforated and the guide would not come out.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information has been requested, but is unavailable at this time.
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Additional information was received (b)(6) 2021.Due to a defect in the distal tip, the device was unable to be inserted through the skin.A wire guide was unable to be removed from the device due to the perforation.Another device was used to continue the procedure.On (b)(6) 2021, information was received that no holes were found on the device.
|
Event summary: as reported, during an unknown procedure, a performer introducer was unable to pass through the skin.The introducer was perforated and the guide would not come out.Due to a defect in the distal tip, the device was unable to be inserted through the skin.A wire guide was unable to be removed from the device due to the perforation.Another device was used to continue the procedure.On 13jan2021, information was received that no holes were found on the device.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, drawing, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.The complainant returned the complaint device to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed: one 14fr rcf was received with slight biomatter present, and the dilator within the sheath.Inspection found the distal end of the sheath was slightly flared out but not sharp or split, potentially due to advancement.An.038" wire guide was inserted in the dilator without difficulty.No damage noted to the distal end of the dilator.No other damage was noted.At this time, cook concluded that the device was manufactured within specification.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: review of product labeling: cook also reviewed product labeling.The product ifu, ¿introducers,¿ provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied: ¿supplied sterilized by ethylene oxide gas in peel-open packages.Intended for one-time use.Sterile if package is unopened or undamaged.Do not use the product if there is doubt as to whether the product is sterile.Store in a dark, dry, cool place.Avoid extended exposure to light.Upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ cook has concluded patient anatomy possibly contributed to this incident.It is unknown what the insertion site¿s anatomy was like, and scaring could have damaged the sheath during insertion.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|