Additional information has been provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.10.The company service representative examined the system and was able to confirm but not replicate the reported irrigation event.The system was then tested and met all product specifications.With no additional, related information provided, the customer reported events of corneal burn, haze at the incision site, and sutures placed could not be confirmed.The system manufacturing device history record (dhr) was reviewed.Based on assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The system was found to meet specifications; therefore, the root cause of the reported events cannot be determined conclusively.Corneal burn is an issue that is occasionally reported with cataract surgery.According to the pennsylvania patient safety advisory abstract: preventing corneal burns during phacoemulsification, (b)(6) 2010, vol.7, no.1: 23-25, most corneal burns can be traced to issues related to surgical technique and not to malfunctioning equipment.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|