| Model Number GELSOFT DOUBLE BIFURCATE |
| Device Problems
Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Perforation (2205); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Event Date 12/08/2021 |
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturers narrative.Health effect clinical code - 4582 - site reported no health impact on patient impact code - 2199 - no health consequences or impact.Medical device problem code - 2978 - material integrity problem - site has reported leakage from device code - 2205 - material perforation - site reported leakage from hole in device code - 1504 - material puncture / hole - site have reported leakage from hole in device component code - 4755 - part/component/sub-assembly term not applicable - graft is manufactured from two bifurcates to create a double bifurcate and as such does not have distinct sub assemblies or parts type of investigation code 4109 - historical data analysis - a review of previous complaints for last 5 years for hole or pinhole leakage related to gelsoft range and found an occurrence rate of 0.011% code 3331 - analysis of production records - a review of qc and manufacturing records showed this batch was manufactured to design specification.No issues were found with porosity testing of base material and finished product.Code 4111 - communication / interviews - vascutek ltd.Has requested further information from site on preparation of device and handling during procedure and will provide summary of findings in next follow up or final report.Investigation findings code 3233 - results pending completion of investigation - investigation is still ongoing and will be reported in next follow up / final report.Investigation conclusions code -11 - conclusion not yet available.
|
| |
|
Event Description
|
|
Blood leakage: after the proximal part was anastomosed, blood leakage occurred at a pinhole on the joint surface between the graft body and the side branch.When the renal artery was reconstructed, the graft was clamped using graft-clamping forceps with a soft nelaton cover.Then, three pinholes were found and blood leakage was noted.Since the proximal side had already been sutured, it was impossible to replace the graft with another one.As hemostasis was not achieved by manual compression only, a 5-0 suture was used for suture and hemostasis.Hemostasis was successfully achieved.No health damage to the patient has been reported.The surgeon used the graft as usual.Blood leaked just by picking the part up with a pair of tweezers.The cause of this event is unknown, but there is a possibility that the device itself might have a problem.Operation type: thoracoabdominal vascular prosthesis replacement.
|
| |
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturers narrative.Health effect: clinical code - 4582 - site reported no health impact on patient; impact code - 2199 - no health consequences or impact.Medical device problem: code - 2978 - material integrity problem - site has reported leakage from device; code - 2205 - material perforation - site reported leakage from hole in device; code - 1504 - material puncture / hole - site have reported leakage from hole in device.Component code - 4755 - part/component/sub-assembly term not applicable - graft is manufactured from two bifurcates to create a double bifurcate and as such does not have distinct sub assemblies or parts.Type of investigation.Code 4109 - historical data analysis - a review of previous complaints for last 5 years for hole or pinhole leakage related to gelsoft range and found an occurrence rate of (b)(4)% code 3331 - analysis of production records - a review of qc and manufacturing records showed this batch was manufactured to design specification.No issues were found with porosity testing of base material and finished product.Code 4111 - communication / interviews - communication/interviews - additional information was requested from site on procedure and if device was presoaked prior to procedure as per warnings and precautions in ifu.Site informed vascutek that device was not pre-soaked prior to procedure.Code - 213 - no device problem found - no issue was found with the manufacture and testing of the complaint batch.Conclusion: code - 4315 - cause not established - as the device was not returned for investigation and from the information received, vascutek ltd could not determine a root cause for this event.It is unknown if the fact that the device was not pre-soaked had any effect therefore on the performance of the device.Vascutek ltd.Now considers this complaint closed.Further action is not planned, however, the issue will be tracked and trended as part of the on-going complaints trending and reporting process and if an adverse trend develops action may be taken at that time.
|
| |
|
Event Description
|
|
Blood leakage: after the proximal part was anastomosed, blood leakage occurred at a pinhole on the joint surface between the graft body and the side branch.When the renal artery was reconstructed, the graft was clamped using graft-clamping forceps with a soft nelaton cover.Then, three pinholes were found and blood leakage was noted.Since the proximal side had already been sutured, it was impossible to replace the graft with another one.As hemostasis was not achieved by manual compression only, a 5-0 suture was used for suture and hemostasis.Hemostasis was successfully achieved.No health damage to the patient has been reported.The surgeon used the graft as usual.Blood leaked just by picking the part up with a pair of tweezers.The cause of this event is unknown, but there is a possibility that the device itself might have a problem.Operation type: thoracoabdominal vascular prosthesis replacement.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
