The previous medwatch report was submitted by william cook (b)(4) under manufacturer report reference# 3002808486-2020-01159.Additional information provided determined that this device was manufactured by cook inc.With the submission of this initial medwatch report, cook inc.Informs that all future submissions regarding this complaint will be handled under the manufacturer report number.Occupation: non-healthcare professional investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: aorta/organ/vena cava (vc) perforation, deep vein thrombosis (dvt), tilt, stomach pain, anxiety, limited activities.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported stomach pain, anxiety, and limited activities are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number is known; however, the lot number is unknown.The alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2014 via the left common femoral vein due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt).The patient alleges tilt and vena cava/organ perforation.The patient further alleges perforated aorta, stomach pain, anxiety, limited activities, and deep vein thrombosis (dvt).On (b)(6) 2019, per a report from computed report; ¿positive for caval perforation.Superior extent of filter is at superior l2 vertebral body.Inferior extent inferior l3 vertebral body.A total of four prongs have perforated through ivc.Maximum distance prong perforated through ivc is 4.52mm.Coronal images show 2.46-degree tilt of filter left-to-right.Sagittal images show 3.16-degree tilt anterior-to-posterior.Diameter of ivc directly above filter measures 20.11mm x 27.47mm.Attention: a prong has perforated aorta.¿.
|