• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RF310F
Device Problems Malposition of Device (2616); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 01/09/2010
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately one year and two months post filter deployment, the patient presented with left lower quadrant pain and known left renal atrophy.Subsequently on the same day, computed tomography (ct) revealed that there was an inferior vena cava filter seen lying in an abnormal transverse orientation below the right renal vein.At least 1 of the filter legs appeared to have penetrated through the inferior vena cava wall.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for malposition of the inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the alleged perforation of the perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc) because based on the medical record provided, at least 1 of the filter legs appeared to have penetrated through the inferior vena cava wall.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(expiry date: 08/2011).
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with right leg deep venous thrombosis and recent brain surgery/transsphenoidal hypophysectomy.Approximately one year and two months post filter deployment, a computed tomography (ct) abdomen and pelvis without intravenous contrast revealed that the filter lay in a transverse orientation and perforated the vena cava.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The patient reportedly experienced left lower quadrant pain; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key11250479
MDR Text Key229324629
Report Number2020394-2021-80139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K062887
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/29/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRF310F
Device Lot NumberGFSG4584
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/20/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-