• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY HUMAPEN ERGO TEAL/CLEAR FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY HUMAPEN ERGO TEAL/CLEAR FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES Back to Search Results
Model Number MS8929
Device Problems Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371); Inaccurate Delivery (2339); Mechanical Jam (2983); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem Hyperglycemia (1905)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Narrative field: new, updated, and corrected information is referenced within the update statements. Please refer to update statement(s) dated (b)(6) 2021. No further follow-up is planned. Evaluation summary a male patient reported that the cartridge holder of his humapen ergo device would be pulled out when removing the pen cap. He also reported that "sometimes the injection button was stuck when pressed, a little worn, the pressing pressure was uneven and the dosage was not so stable when injected. " he experienced abnormal blood glucose. The device was not returned to the manufacturer for investigation (batch 0407a02, manufactured july 2004). Therefore, it could not be evaluated to confirm the complaint or presence of a malfunction. Malfunction unknown. A complaint history review of the batch did not identify any atypical findings with regard to loose cartridge holder, dose accuracy, pen jam, or injection force uneven issues. While the patient reported obtaining the device in (b)(6) 2018, based on the amount of time elapsed since this device was manufactured (2004), it is likely that the device is beyond its approved use life. The user manual states the humapen ergo device has been designed to be used for up to 3 years after first use. Based on the information provided by the patient, there is no evidence of improper use or storage.
 
Event Description
Lilly case id: (b)(4). This report is associated with product complaint: (b)(4). This spontaneous case, reported by a consumer who contacted the company to report adverse events and a product complaint (pc), concerned a male patient of unknown age and origin. Medical history included hypertension. Concomitant medication included metformin and acarbose; both for unknown indications. The patient received insulin lispro protamine suspension 75%/insulin lispro 25% (rdna origin) (humalog mix25) from a cartridge via reusable pen humapen ergo (teal/clear), at 20 units, twice a day, subcutaneously, for the treatment of diabetes mellitus, beginning sometime in (b)(6) 2018. Sometime in (b)(6) 2020, while on insulin lispro 75/25 treatment, he was hospitalized due to diabetes mellitus and the blood glucose was not well controlled (values, units and normal reference range not provided); which occurred due to the fault of injection pen humapen ergo like when the pen cap was pulled out, the humapen ergo cartridge holder would be pulled out together. Sometimes the injection button was stuck when pressed, a little worn, the pressing pressure was uneven and the dosage was not so stable when injected (incorrect dose administered)(pc number: (b)(4) and batch number: 0407a02). As of (b)(6) 2021, he was hospitalized. The information regarding corrective treatment and outcome for events was not provided. Insulin lispro 75/25 treatment was continued. No additional follow-up would be attempted as the reporter refused to be followed up via phone and no treating physician contact information was provided. The operator of the humapen ergo and his/her training status was not provided. The general humapen ergo model duration of use and the suspect humapen ergo model duration of use was approximately two years seven months. The humapen ergo (teal/clear),(lot number 0407a02) associated with product complaint (b)(4) was not returned to the manufacturer. The reporting consumer did not know if the event of blood glucose abnormal was related while did not provide any relatedness for the remaining event with insulin lispro 75/25 treatment. The reporting consumer did not provide any relatedness for the event of blood glucose abnormal while related the remaining event with its humapen ergo. Edit 22jan2021: updated medwatch and european and canadian (eu/ca) fields for expedited device reporting. No new information added. 01feb2021: additional information received on 28jan2021 from the global product complaint database. Entered device specific safety summary (dsss). Updated the medwatch fields with device information and the european and (b)(6) (eu/(b)(6)) device information. Added date of manufacturer for the humapen ergo (teal/clear),(lot number 0407a02) device associated with product complaint (b)(4) which was not returned to the manufacturer. Corresponding fields and narrative updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NameHUMAPEN ERGO TEAL/CLEAR
Type of DeviceFOR TREATMENT PURPOSES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
lilly corporate center
indianapolis IN 46285
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILLIPS-MEDISIZE CORPORATION
415 red cedar street
medical device manufacturing
menomonie WI 54751
Manufacturer Contact
chris davis
lilly corporate center
indianapolis, IN 46285
3174334585
MDR Report Key11266555
MDR Text Key233301027
Report Number1819470-2021-00014
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K982842
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,foreign
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/02/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/02/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberMS8929
Device Lot Number0407A02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received01/15/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/31/2004
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial

Patient Treatment Data
Date Received: 02/02/2021 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-