It was reported that during the bankart repair case, it was noticed that there was a major defect with suturefix ultra anchor.The anchor could not be deployed since the product was already damaged before usage.A backup device was used in additional bone hole and no delay or patient injuries were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.An analysis of the customer provided image revealed that the suture anchor is loose and pushed to one side due to prong being broke off of device.A visual inspection revealed the device was returned with original packaging.The anchor and suture thread are still in place.Further review found device trigger does not slide smoothly as it should.Also, it was found that anchor and suture were shifted to one side at the tip of device due to one of the prongs that hold anchor in place is broken off.No other physical damage visible to the device.A functional evaluation of the returned device did not allow for a functional evaluation of the reported event.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate a review of the procedure found that each component should be visually inspected for all non-conforming attributes defined in the procedure.It was determined the device did not contribute to the reported event.Based on the information provided, a backup device was used in an additional bone hole to complete the procedure without delay or patient injuries.The impact to the patient beyond the additional bone hole cannot be determined.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should any additional relevant clinical information be provided, this complaint would be re-assessed.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors, which could have contributed to the complaint event, include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.Correction in h6 evaluation codes.
|