• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JUG
Device Problems Obstruction of Flow (2423); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Pain (1994); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Stenosis (2263); No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Non-healthcare professional.Investigation it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that the patient received a gunther tulip mreye on (b)(6) 2011, and the patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2011 via the right internal jugular vein due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt).Patient is alleging tilt, vena cava perforation,organ perforation and stenosis.The patient further alleges chronic lower back pain and physical limitations.Report from ct (computed tomography): "a tent shaped inferior vena cava filter is identified in place with head located 2.5 cm above the level of the right renal vein (the lowest renal vein).This is angled dorsally relative to the long axis of the ivc by 21 degrees.This is slightly angled in coronal plane relative to the ivc by 10 degrees.It has four long peripheral struts interconnected by thin wire design.No filter fracture is detected or displaced fragment.Peripheral struts: posterior strut is tenting the wall of the ivc (perforation grade 1).Left lateral strut is perforating the wall of the ivc with the tip in the wall of the 3rd duodenum portion (perforation grade 3, appreciable in three planes best defined on sagittal reformatted images).Anterior strut is abutting the wall of the third duodenum portion with no penetration of the duodenum (perforation grade 2).Right lateral strut slightly perforating the wall of the ivc with the tip surrounded by retroperitoneal fat (is perforation grade 2).The inferior vena cava is narrowed in caliber above the level of the filter (for a 2.3 cm length segment) and has a normal caliber in its retrohepatic portion.The lower abdominal inferior vena cava and iliac veins have a normal caliber.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava (vc)/organ perforation, stenosis, tilt, back pain, physical limitations filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported back pain and physical limitations are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key11294789
MDR Text Key234406903
Report Number1820334-2021-00281
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K072240
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/28/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/01/2013
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-JUG
Device Lot Number2573287
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/13/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Other;
Patient Weight67
-
-