Udi#: (b)(4).A review of the lot records was conducted and there were no indications of problems that could have caused or contributed to the complaint.While records indicate that the affected part will be returned for investigation, the part has not yet been received and photographs were not provided, so the failure could not be confirmed.Previous similar investigations identified excessive force when impacting, normal wear and tear, and off-axis loading as potential causes for breakage or damage of similar instruments.If the part is later returned to integra this investigation may be reopened and updated.
|
Additional information- d9, g1, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h10 the glenoid baseplate impactor was returned for evaluation: a review of the lot records was conducted and there were no indications of problems that could have caused or contributed to the complaint.Failure analysis - visual examination of the part identified that a portion of the radel plastic tip of the impactor head was broken off and missing.The failure was confirmed.Root cause - failure analysis of the returned part confirmed the potential causes for the instrument breakage of excessive force when impacting, normal wear and tear, and off-axis loading as identified by previous similar investigations.
|