• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600LDS29A
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/27/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported, during a transfemoral transcatheter pulmonic valve replacement with a 29mm sapien 3 valve in a previously implanted edwards surgical valve, the delivery system balloon never inflated.The devices were removed successfully as a unit with no patient injury.It is uncertain exactly when and where the balloon damage occurred.New devices were used, and the valve was successfully implanted.The patient is stable post procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The delivery system was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.In addition, no relevant imagery was provided for review.Due to the unavailability of the device, no manufacturing non-conformances were identified during the evaluation.During the manufacturing process, the delivery system was visually inspected and tested several times.The balloons are 100% dimensionally inspected for any defects.During final inspection, 100% distal to proximal visual inspection is performed by both manufacturing and quality.Flex catheters and balloon catheters are 100% leak tested.Furthermore, the delivery system was tested and inspected on sample devices from each lot under a sampling basis during product verification (pv) testing.These inspections and tests during the manufacturing process support that it is unlikely that a non-conformance contributed to the reported complaint.A device history review (dhr) was performed and did not reveal any manufacturing non=conformance that would have contributed to this complaint event.A lot history review was performed and revealed no additional similar complaints relating to delivery system leakage.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.A review of the risk management documentation was performed, and the reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint for delivery system leakage was unable to be confirmed as neither the complaint device nor applicable imagery was provided for evaluation.A review of dhr, lot history, and manufacturing mitigations supported that a manufacturing non-conformance likely did not contribute to the reported events.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As no patient or procedural imagery was provided, a definitive root cause is unable to be determined at this point.However, it is possible that interactions with potential calcification found in the patient's access vessel may have damaged the balloon during the procedure.It is also possible that potential excessive manipulation of the device during valve alignment or tracking through the patient's anatomy may have led to delivery system damage and the reported leakage and inability to fully inflate the balloon.However, without the return of the device, there is insufficient information available to determine a definite root cause.Since no product non-conformances or ifu/training deficiencies were identified during evaluation, a product risk assessment escalation and corrective/preventative actions are not required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An administrative review of 3500a forms posted on the maude database showed this manufacturer report was submitted with the incorrect (common device name, product code, pma number, or other missed or incorrect information).A correction to section g4 is being submitted in this supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key11363273
MDR Text Key249090747
Report Number2015691-2021-01380
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPV
UDI-Device Identifier00690103193961
UDI-Public(01)00690103193961(17)220910(10)63407910
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P200015
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/22/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/10/2022
Device Model Number9600LDS29A
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot Number63407910
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/29/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/14/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-