No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence, adhesions, inflammation, chronic pain, mesh detachment and surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence, adhesions, and inflammation as possible complications.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.This emdr represents the bard/davol mesh - composix kugel (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh - composix kugel (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2005, the patient had a large oval bard/davol composix kugel mesh implanted to repair a hernia defect.It is alleged that on or about (b)(6) 2006, the patient underwent surgery to revise the initial kugel mesh and a second bard/davol composix kugel mesh, medium was implanted to repair a recurrent hernia defect.On or about (b)(6) 2008, the patient underwent removal surgery of the kugel meshes and a non-bard/davol product was implanted during this procedure.Attorney alleges that the patient underwent additional revision surgery on (b)(6) 2008 and removal surgeries of one of the mesh products on (b)(6) 2008, (b)(6) 2009 and (b)(6) 20012.Attorney alleges that the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and chronic physical pain, mental anguish, multiple surgeries to remove mesh, scarring, dense adhesions, adhesions to small bowel, mobile or detached mesh, abdominal wall reconstruction, inflammation, and recurrence.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the device was defective.
|