The device was not returned.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents reported from this lot.All available information was investigated and a cause for the reported leak could not be determined.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed to report leak.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (dmr) with a grade of 4.Prior to the procedure and during prep of the steerable guide catheter (sgc) the sgc failed prep as it could not hold the fluid column.It was attempted twice but still failed so a new sgc was prepped and was able to be used.The clip delivery system (cds) was then advanced to the mitral valve and when it was placed, the mean pressure gradient increased to 7 mmhg and heart rate was 60.The clip was moved and placed again, and again the mean pressure gradient went to 7 mmhg, heart rate 60.Finally it was decided to invert the clip and remove it from the anatomy.No treatment was performed for the bradycardia.A new nt cds was advanced and implanted and the mean pressure gradient was 5 mmhg and mr was reduced to 2.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|