As reported, during the stenting of the right superficial femoral artery via left groin access, the check-flo valve of a flexor ansel guiding sheath came apart twice during the procedure while inserting a stent graft system through the device.The user held the stent at the body of the device and not by the valve.The device was in place for about 15 minutes.There was no tortuous, scarred, or calcified anatomy noted.The patient experienced minimal blood loss, but did not require any intervention.A different manufacturer's device was used to complete the procedure.The patient was moved to recovery, and the patient's outcome was reported as "good".No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to the occurrence.
|
Event summary as reported, during the stenting of the right superficial femoral artery via left groin access, the check-flo valve of a flexor ansel guiding sheath came apart twice during the procedure while inserting a stent graft system through the device.The user held the stent at the body of the device and not by the valve.The device was in place for about 15 minutes.There was no tortuous, scarred, or calcified anatomy noted.The patient experienced minimal blood loss but did not require any intervention.A different manufacturer's device was used to complete the procedure.The patient was moved to recovery, and the patient's outcome was reported as "good".No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to the occurrence.Investigation - evaluation reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, drawing, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures of the device were conducted during the investigation.No device was returned for investigation.Accordingly, no physical examination could be performed.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and no additional lot-related complaints were received.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.No gaps were identified in the device manufacturing instructions or quality control procedures.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which warn, ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal.Reinsertion of dilator prior to removal of flexor sheath increases the strength of the sheath and lessens the risk of device separation.If resistance is anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of flexor sheath, consider carefully reinserting the dilator prior to continuing removal.¿ the ifu further cautions, ¿in order to ensure device compatibility, choose a sheath size large enough to accommodate the maximum outer diameter of any devices that will be placed through the sheath.All interventional or diagnostic instruments used with this product should move freely through the valve and sheath to avoid damage.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that a component failure contributed to this incident.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|