Catalog Number 121887350 |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
Patient Problems
Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Pain (1994); Joint Dislocation (2374); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Joint Laxity (4526); Physical Asymmetry (4573); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Date 02/15/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Revision pinnacle metal liner because of methalosis.No surgical delay.No reported product deficiency.Doi (b)(6) 2009, dor (b)(6) 2021.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
A.Was surgery time extended? if yes, what is the duration of the delay? answer: no.B.What is the affected side involved in this event? answer: methallosis.C.Are the products available for return? answer: shipped to cg labs.G.Was there any suggestion by anyone indicating that there was or may be deficiency with the product(s)? answer: no.H.Can you confirm the name of the hospital where the revision surgery was done? answer: (b)(6).I.Can you please confirm if the head is also a depuy product? if yes, please provide product and lot details.Answer: yes-code:136536310 lot:3190861.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
As per additional information received, it was indicated that the doi (b)(6) 2009 however we have identified that the product/lot combinations provided for the liner and was not yet available until (b)(6) 2010.Could you please re-verify product details for hte liner or the date of implant or was there a previous revision that involves depuy products? if yes, please provide product details or if it was previously reported kindly provide a complaint number.Answer: in the attachment (notes & attachments) you have an example of deregistration from that operation on which the date of the operation is visible (b)(6) 2009 and all the components that were installed during that operation.Please confirm if head was revised? answer: the head has been revised as well.Can you please clarify what you mean by "squizing and after that luksation"? was squeaking and luxation? answer: the luxation occurred primarily and that is the reason for the audit.After that, when they opened the patient, they saw that it was also metallosis.Squeezing was also but that was not the reason for the operation.Squeezing occurs with this combination of implants.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
The revision surgery occurred on (b)(6) 2021 on the left hip.Prior to revision, patient was having pain and instability in the left hip.Primary implantation was in 2010 and since then had occasional feelings of "skipping" in the hip.Patient was dislocated in 2017 and 2020 requiring a "readjustment" in the hospital both times.The patient has had limping, walking difficulty and fear of falling.The patient's left leg was 5mm longer than the right.Surgeon also stated that the patient had a r tha in 2009 requiring revision in 2015 due to metallosis, though no indication of manufacturer.The revision surgery was performed where heavy, dark effusion and a large mass of brittle granulation tissue was found.Osteolysis was noted around the proximal part of the stem and around the cup.The cup and stem were left in situ.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # : pc-(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: examination of the returned device and x-ray images did not identify any product defects or anomalies.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional info be received, the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).Where the lot code was provided, a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.Corrected: h3.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|