• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYPODJ45-A
Device Problems Unraveled Material (1664); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem Vasoconstriction (2126)
Event Date 02/02/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned pod pc confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly and was unraveled.Further evaluation of the returned pod pc revealed that the pe-fiber was fractured.This type of damage typically occurs if the pod pc is forcefully retracted or manipulated against resistance.The complaint stated that several attempts were made to re-position the pod pc.This damage likely resulted in the embolization coil detaching from its pusher assembly.Some of the damage may have occurred while snaring the embolization coil during removal.The damage to the lantern mentioned in the complaint could not be confirmed.The lantern was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the collateral vessels off the subclavian artery using pod packing coils (pod pcs) and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, the physician made several attempts to re-position the pod pc and during one attempt approximately four fifths of the coil was inside a collateral vessel off of the right subclavian artery when the lantern kicked out and the pod pc detached.The physician used a snare to pull the detached coil into the lantern.Approximately half-way through removal of the pod pc, the collateral vessel spasmed.The physician pulled the snare back with more force and upon removal of the lantern containing the pod pc from the patient, the physician noticed that the coil had unraveled.On the back table, before re-advancing the lantern, the physician noticed the lantern tip was compressed.Therefore, the lantern was no longer used in the procedure.Due to the patient's age, it was reported that no medical treatment was administered to treat the vasospasm.Therefore, the physician gave the patient's vessel time to relax before re-accessing it and implanting two ruby coils using a new lantern.The procedure was completed successfully and the patient is stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD PACKING COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key11416351
MDR Text Key234973255
Report Number3005168196-2021-00404
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017662
UDI-Public00814548017662
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K170852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,02/02/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/04/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBYPODJ45-A
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPODJ45
Device Lot NumberF98113
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age9 YR
Patient Weight32
-
-