Product complaint (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d4 (lot) and d9.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected: g1 and h3.
|
Product complaint (b)(4).Investigation summary: examination of the returned device confirmed the presence of excess material on the lateral notch adjacent to the lug, where the femoral introducer grips onto the implant.(b)(4) has been opened for this nonconformance.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: product code 150400207, work order (b)(4), was manufactured on 29 sep 2020.- (b)(4) parts were manufactured per specification, and all raw material met specification.- there was one scrap part found to be associated with work order (b)(4): a628 - ap undersize anterior ¿ this scrap reason does not correlate with the failure mode for this complaint - there is one non-conformances (nc) found to be associated with work order (b)(4): (b)(4) relates to a snap gauge failing calibration.Therefore, there is no correlation between (b)(4) and the failure mode for this complaint.- there was no reprocessing associated with work order (b)(4).- the finished goods femoral work order (b)(4) was issued from foundry work orders ((b)(4)).- from a review of the laser mark on the complaint unit (figure 10), it was confirmed that the part originated from work order (b)(4) - product code 150400407, work order (b)(4), was manufactured on 15 sep 2020.- (b)(4) out of (b)(4) parts were manufactured per specification, and all raw material met specification for work order (b)(4).- there were two scrap parts found to be associated with work order (b)(4): a272 ¿ grinding damage (post cast) ¿ this scrap reason does not correlate with the failure mode for this complaint.A276 ¿ ceramic defects (post cast) ¿ this scrap reason does not correlate with the failure mode for this complaint.- there are two non-conformances (nc) found to be associated with work order (b)(4) : (b)(4) relates to a label scanning issue.Therefore, there is no correlation between (b)(4) and the failure mode for this complaint.(b)(4) relates to a laser mark issue.Therefore, there is no correlation between (b)(4) and the failure mode for this complaint.- there was no reprocessing associated with work order (b)(4).- foundry work order (b)(4) was issued into two different femoral work orders (b)(4) (review covered above) and (b)(4) - product code 150400207, work order (b)(4), was manufactured on 13 oct 2020.- (b)(4) parts were manufactured per specification, and all raw material met specification for work order (b)(4).- there were zero scrap parts found to be associated with work order (b)(4).- there is one non-conformances (nc) found to be associated with work order (b)(4) : (b)(4) relates to a snap gauge failing calibration.Therefore, there is no correlation between (b)(4) and the failure mode for this complaint.- there were (b)(4) reprocessed parts found to be associated with work order (b)(4): impact damage ¿ this rework reason does not correlate with the failure mode of this complaint.Corrected: h3.
|