H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review, a device history record review and complete manufacturing review could not be conducted for the investigation as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: one powerport duo mri attached to a catheter was returned for evaluation.Visual, microscopic visual, tactile and functional evaluation were performed on the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the reported material protrusion and identified partial blockage issues as one of the two port septa(right) was partially dislodged and upon infusing the port, leak was noted from the partially dislodged septum.Further during functional evaluation the right septum failed the mandrel test.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: g3, h6 (device).H11: h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|