• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE UNKNOWN DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE UNKNOWN DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Stenosis (2263); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The previous medwatch report was submitted by cook inc. Under manufacturer report reference #1820334-2018-03216. Additional information provided determined that this device was manufactured by william cook europe. With the submission of this initial report, william cook europe informs that all future submissions regarding this complaint will be handled under manufacturer report reference# in this medwatch report. Non-healthcare professional. Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: organ/vena cava perforation, embedment, ivc stenosis, difficult to retrieve, migration, tilt. Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided. The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date. Filter interacts with ivc wall, e. G. Penetration/perforation/embedment. This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e. G. , a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter). Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration. Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines. This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters. Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis. Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up. The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up. Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered. Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated. Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e. G. , a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications). For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth. The filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set. It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever. Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques. The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position. The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established. Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve. For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth. Filter or filter fragment migration and (or) embolization (e. G. , movement to the heart or lungs) has been reported. Filter or filter fragment movement has occurred in both the cranial and caudal direction and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters smaller or larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; deployment into thrombus; dislodgement due to large thrombus burdens; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in situ filter (e. G. , a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter). Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter migration, trauma to adjacent structures. Filter tilt has been reported. Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e. G. , a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt. Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency. Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt. Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged celect is manufactured and inspected according to specifications. No evidence suggest sthat this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e. G. Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava. This report includes information known at this time. A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2006 via the right femoral approach due to post pulmonary embolism (pe). Patient alleges tilt, vena cava perforation, migration, organ perforation and embedment. Additional information received alleges that the patient expired on 05apr2019 as a result of a cerebrovascular accident. The cerebrovascular accident was due to, or a consequence of, recurrent strokes, toxic metabolic encephalopathy, and hyperammonemia. Diabetes mellitus was listed as a contributing condition to the patient's expiration that did not result in an underlying cause.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NameUNKNOWN
Type of DeviceDTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
Manufacturer Contact
thomas hessner kirk
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632 
56868686
MDR Report Key11495742
MDR Text Key245515584
Report Number3002808486-2021-00955
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Reporter Occupation
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional?
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received02/17/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial

Patient Treatment Data
Date Received: 03/16/2021 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-