• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC STEALTHSTATION S7; INSTRUMENT, STEREOTAXIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC STEALTHSTATION S7; INSTRUMENT, STEREOTAXIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 9733858
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage (1772); Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Unspecified Infection (1930); Convulsion/Seizure (4406); Unspecified Nervous System Problem (4426); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 12/20/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age or date of birth: this value is the average age of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.Sex: this value reflects the gender of the majority of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.The unique identifier was not known at the time of reporting.Date of event: please note that this date is based off of the date when the article was accepted for publication as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.No parts have been received by the manufacturer for evaluation.The manufacture date was not known at the time of reporting.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Hall, s., kabwama, s., sadek, a.R., dando, a., roach, j., weidmann, c., grundy, p., awake craniotomy for tumour resection: the safety and feasibility of a simple technique.Interdisciplinary neurosurgery: advanced techniques and case management.2021 24 (1-6).Ht tps://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Inat.2020.101070 introduction: awake craniotomy is widely used for surgery in eloquent brain in order to facilitate maximal safe resection of brain tumours.There has been huge progress in both surgical and anaesthetic techniques used during awake craniotomy.This study reports a single surgeon experience of awake craniotomy for tumour resection over a 14 year period focusing on the safety and feasibility of a simple technique.Methods: patients who underwent awake craniotomy for tumour resection between 2006 and 2019 (inclusive) were identified retrospectively from theatre logbooks in an nhs neurosciences centre.Case note review was performed to collect data on demographics, histology, intra-operative mapping and complications.Results: four hundred and sixty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 52.0 ± 14.3 years.Three hundred and seventy-seven (80.2%) of the tumours were primary tumours of which who grade iv were the most common (n = 204, 54.1%).Ninety-two (19.6%) of the tumours were metastases with breast (n = 23, 25.0%), skin (n = 22, 23.91%) and lung (n = 22, 23.9%) being the most common primary malignancies.The frontal lobe was the most common location (n = 221, 47.1%).The median length of stay was 1 day.One hundred and seven (22.8%) patients had complications with neurological deficits (n = 73, 15.6%), being the most common however only 8 patients (1.7%) had permanent neurological deficits.Discussion: this is the largest published uk series of awake craniotomy for tumour resection.It demonstrates the safety and feasibility of a simple and easily reproducible technique with a low incidence of permanent neurological deficits and short durations of hospital admission.Reported events of the 175 patients who remained in hospital longer than one day post-operatively 54 had a documented complication requiring treatment or observation.114 complications were recorded for 107 (22.8%) patients.73 neurological deficits were reported and found to be the most common complication 8 patients were left with a permanent new neurological deficit 4 patients had a vascular aetiology (stroke) 1 patient had severe brain swelling intra-operatively 1 patient had rapidly progressive weakness due to eloquently placed tumour remnant 1 patient suffered expressive dysphasia in a tumour biopsied because it was all positively mapped 1 patient with a tumour in eloquent cortex all of which mapped positive but the patient elected to proceed with tumour resection regardless, accepting the morbidity.28 patients had significant seizures which was the second most common complication 5 patients developing new post-operative seizures 1 patient had major seizures that prevented further surgery and required general anesthesia 5 patients had post-operative haemorrhage requiring a return to theatre for evacuation of the haematoma 3 patients had an infected bone flap 2 patient had a cerebrospinal fluid leak 2 patients had hydrocephalus/pseudomeningocoele requiring a ventriculoperitoneal shunt 1 patient had a deep vein thrombosis 1 patient did not tolerate an awake procedure and had their procedure abandoned after taking a biopsy only as it wasn't safe to proceed due to highly eloquent tumour location 4 patients had their procedure aborted after a biopsy only because the entire area of brain involved with tumour had positive mapping.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STEALTHSTATION S7
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, STEREOTAXIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer Contact
david gustafson
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635149628
MDR Report Key11630949
MDR Text Key245107401
Report Number1723170-2021-00918
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K050438
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/07/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9733858
Device Catalogue Number9733858
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-