Patient's exact age is unknown; however, it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.
(b)(4).
The returned microknife xl was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the device was in good condition without visual damage.
The working length of the device was cut to expose the cutting wire and was observed under magnification and the cutting wire was broken, and the distal tip was blackened.
The dimensional and functional evaluation were not performed due to the condition of the device.
No other problems with the device were noted.
The product analysis revealed that the cutting wire was broken.
Upon analysis, it was found that the cutting wire was broken, and blackened including the distal tip, causing the needle unable to extend.
Based on the condition of the device, the problem found could have been caused by maximum of voltage rating exceeded while energization or if the cutting wire was not in constant motion.
Based on all gathered information, the most probable root cause of this complaint is adverse event related to procedure.
A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.
A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|