If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.It was reported that while doing a quality check of equipment he found that the scope has a crack, and the coupler had the holders (ears) appear to be broken off and can't hold a scope.Per service manual operational and diagnostic, the reported failure was confirmed.During evaluation, the scopes were identified bent/dented, the outer tube was damage, the distal tip had deposits and moisture was found in the system; therefore, they were replaced.The repair and testing of the unit was completed per the service manual, bringing the unit back to full functionality.The unit passed all functional tests and is fully operational.The possible root cause for the deposits on the distal tip and the moisture can be related to an improper cleaning of device after usage by the customer.Also, for damage on the tube and scope is most likely a result of user mishandling or heavily use.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
It was reported by the sales rep that during quality check the endoscope device, it was observed that the device had a crack.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the distal tip had deposits.There was no procedure nor patient involvement reported.No additional information was provided.
|