A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.Pma / 510k number: the bd phoenix pmic/id-106 is an antimicrobial resistance panel which consists of a combination of the following 510k numbers: k131331, k020322, k021954, k022172, k023273, k023301, k024152, k030677, k031306, k031679, k032131, k033784, k033907, k040006, k040106, k040716, k050555, k051689, k053241, k060214, k060217, k060218, k060493, k082538, k082852, k082913.
|
It was reported that while using bd phoenix¿ pmic/id-106 a misidentification was observed by the laboratory personnel.A gram stain test and a reference lab test were used to confirm the results as a misidentification.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: " organism was id'd as corynebacterium striatum, by (b)(6) , at a reference lab.It was reported that an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Customer problem: misidentification.Steps taken with customer/troubleshooting: customer had an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Isolate was identified by the m50 as strep.Oralis twice.Isolate return expected.".
|
The following fields were updated due to additional information: device available for eval yes, returned to manufacturer on: 2021-05-20 investigation summary: this complaint is for misidentification of corynebacterium striatum as streptococcus oralis when using phoenix panel pmic/id-106 (448606) batch number 0342590.The customer did return isolates, lab reports, and panels for investigation.To investigate, a total of three (3) customer returned panels from the complaint batch were tested using customer returned isolates of corynebacterium striatum on a phoenix m50 instrument and evaluated for identification results.During investigation, all three (3) panels tested identified incorrectly.Two (2) panels identified as staphylococcus schleiferi and one (1) panel identified as streptococcus oralis.Since all panels yielded unsatisfactory identification results, this complaint is confirmed.It is to be noted that maldi testing was also performed on the customer returned isolates and yielded an identification of corynebacterium striatum.A review of quality notifications revealed no quality notifications for the complaint batch.A review of complaints revealed one (1) additional complaint for the complaint batch.Complaint trending was performed and no trends were identified associated with this defect.Bd id/ast plant quality will continue to monitor for trends and take action as necessary.
|
It was reported that while using bd phoenix¿ pmic/id-106 a misidentification was observed by the laboratory personnel.A gram stain test and a reference lab test were used to confirm the results as a misidentification.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "organism was id'd as corynebacterium striatum, by maldi, at a reference lab.It was reported that an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Customer problem: misidentification.Steps taken with customer/troubleshooting: customer had an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Isolate was identified by the m50 as strep.Oralis twice.Isolate return expected.".
|