• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX PMIC/ID-106; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX PMIC/ID-106; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 448606
Device Problem Incorrect Measurement (1383)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/03/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.Pma / 510k number: the bd phoenix pmic/id-106 is an antimicrobial resistance panel which consists of a combination of the following 510k numbers: k131331, k020322, k021954, k022172, k023273, k023301, k024152, k030677, k031306, k031679, k032131, k033784, k033907, k040006, k040106, k040716, k050555, k051689, k053241, k060214, k060217, k060218, k060493, k082538, k082852, k082913.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd phoenix¿ pmic/id-106 a misidentification was observed by the laboratory personnel.A gram stain test and a reference lab test were used to confirm the results as a misidentification.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: " organism was id'd as corynebacterium striatum, by (b)(6) , at a reference lab.It was reported that an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Customer problem: misidentification.Steps taken with customer/troubleshooting: customer had an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Isolate was identified by the m50 as strep.Oralis twice.Isolate return expected.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following fields were updated due to additional information: device available for eval yes, returned to manufacturer on: 2021-05-20 investigation summary: this complaint is for misidentification of corynebacterium striatum as streptococcus oralis when using phoenix panel pmic/id-106 (448606) batch number 0342590.The customer did return isolates, lab reports, and panels for investigation.To investigate, a total of three (3) customer returned panels from the complaint batch were tested using customer returned isolates of corynebacterium striatum on a phoenix m50 instrument and evaluated for identification results.During investigation, all three (3) panels tested identified incorrectly.Two (2) panels identified as staphylococcus schleiferi and one (1) panel identified as streptococcus oralis.Since all panels yielded unsatisfactory identification results, this complaint is confirmed.It is to be noted that maldi testing was also performed on the customer returned isolates and yielded an identification of corynebacterium striatum.A review of quality notifications revealed no quality notifications for the complaint batch.A review of complaints revealed one (1) additional complaint for the complaint batch.Complaint trending was performed and no trends were identified associated with this defect.Bd id/ast plant quality will continue to monitor for trends and take action as necessary.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd phoenix¿ pmic/id-106 a misidentification was observed by the laboratory personnel.A gram stain test and a reference lab test were used to confirm the results as a misidentification.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "organism was id'd as corynebacterium striatum, by maldi, at a reference lab.It was reported that an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Customer problem: misidentification.Steps taken with customer/troubleshooting: customer had an isolate that the gram stain was a gram positive rod.Isolate was identified by the m50 as strep.Oralis twice.Isolate return expected.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX PMIC/ID-106
Type of Device
SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
MDR Report Key11754350
MDR Text Key277774720
Report Number1119779-2021-00750
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LON
UDI-Device Identifier30382904486069
UDI-Public30382904486069
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K021954
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other,user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/30/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date12/31/2021
Device Model Number448606
Device Catalogue Number448606
Device Lot Number0342590
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/20/2021
Date Manufacturer Received06/30/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-