|
Catalog Number 04.027.052S |
Device Problem
Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Initial reporter is j&j company representative.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.The investigation could not be completed.No conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A review of the device history records has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the 04.027.052 pfna ii blade got damaged while inserting the blade into the nail on table.Surgery was delayed 10 minutes due to the reported event.Procedure was successfully completed.Concomitant device reported: unknown nail (part# unknown, lot# unknown, quantity 1).This complaint involves one (1) device.This report is for one (1) pfna-ii blade l85 tan.This report is for 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: the investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.The product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot part: 04.027.052s, lot: 57p1262, manufacturing site: bettlach, release to warehouse date: 08 june 2020, expiry date: 01.May 2030.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the complaint device pfna-ii blade l85 tan (product code: 04.027.052s, lot number: 57p1262) was returned to cq west chester for investigation.The tip of the pfna blade was broken and damaged.There were signs of usage on the item consistent with usage.Functional test: a functional test was not performed as the device was not returned with a mating device.Document /specification review: based on the date of manufacture, the current and manufactured version of the drawings were reviewed.Dimensional inspection: this was identified to be a post manufacturing damage, hence a dimensional inspection was not performed.Complaint confirmed: complaint can be confirmed based on the available information.Conclusion: the tip of the pfna blade had been damaged during implant, hence the complaint was confirmed.A definitive root cause was not determined during investigation.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the surgery was delayed for thirty (30) minutes due to the reported event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|