Product complaint (b)(4).
Additional narrative: additional pro-code: hto.
Complainant device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.
A review of the device history records has been requested and is currently pending completion.
The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, during removal the reamer irrigator aspirator (ria) 2 reamer head broke off during reaming.
The reamer was removed and fragments not retrievable.
It was unknown if there was a surgical delay.
The procedure was successfully completed.
Patient outcome was unknown.
This (b)(4) captures the intra-op event during removal, the reamer head broke off.
(b)(4) captures the postop event, removal due to nonunion.
This complaint involves one (1) device.
This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|