It was reported that there was an issue with pl531r - clip applier/remover d:12.5/350mm.According to the complaint description, the tip of the device was chipped during surgery.The damaged pieces were collected immediately and the surgery was completed without any problems.The cause may be that the tip was caught when it was removed, so it may have been pulled or contacted with forceps.Additional information was not provided.Additional information has been requested but not yet received as of this report.Additional patient information is not available.The adverse event is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|
Updated h6: codes.Investigation results: visual investigation: the product arrived in a clean status with a broken off part.The investigation was carried out visually and microscopically.We made a visual inspection of the product and of the fracture surface.No abnormalities were visible.Additionally we made a visual inspection of the broken off part.Here we also found no abnormalties.Additionally the product was sent to the production department for further investigation.Based on the analysis report of subject expert: "since the minimum thickness of the broken jaw is okay and the hardness was also performed according to specification, we assume overuse by the user here.The long period of use of the instrument should also be noted (the date of manufacture of the instrument is 02/2013).Since the existing sealing cap is not the original ej751200 sealing cap from aesculap ag, we cannot exclude the possibility of a third-party repair.Batch history review: due to the fact that no lot number was provided, a review of the device history records for the complained device is not possible.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 3(5) x probability of occurrence 2(5)) according to din en iso 14971 is still acceptable.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|