It was discovered upon device return that the wire guide of a cook spectrum minocycline/rifampin impregnated double lumen central venous catheter had separated.It was initially reported that the wire guide was difficult to remove from the device as it was withdrawn following catheter placement in the subclavian vein.The physician removed both the wire and catheter together and opened a new device for an attempted second placement.The same issue with difficult wire removal occurred with the new device.A third device was opened to successfully complete the procedure.It was later reported that imaging guidance was used to place the catheter, and no resistance was felt when advancing the wire guide.During placement, the distal tip of the wire was always leading the distal tip of the catheter.Upon return of the two complaint devices to the manufacturer, it was discovered that one wire guide was separated.Two occluded catheters were also found and are referenced in the report with patient identifier: (b)(6).
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation: (b)(6) returned the wire guide of a cook spectrum minocycline/rifampin impregnated double lumen central venous catheter in a separated condition.It was initially reported on 31mar2021 that the wire guide was difficult to remove from the device following catheter placement in the subclavian vein.The physician removed both the wire and catheter together and opened a new device for an attempted second placement.The same issue with difficult wire removal occurred with the new device.A third device was opened to successfully complete the procedure.It was later reported that imaging guidance was used to place the catheter, and no resistance was felt when advancing the wire guide.During placement, the distal tip of the wire was always leading the distal tip of the catheter.Upon return of the two complaint devices to the manufacturer, it was discovered that one wire guide was separated.Two occluded catheters were also found upon device return and are referenced in the medwatch report 1820334-2021-01366.A review of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), and quality control, as well as a visual inspection, functional test, and dimensional verification, were conducted during the investigation.The device was received in a used condition.The wire guide is kinked and slightly bowed.The wire is broken at the proximal weld.The coils were not elongated and there was no protrusion of mandril wire.The outer diameter of the wire guide and inner diameter of catheter end hole were within specification.Cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhr for the reported complaint device lot and relevant sub-assembly lots revealed no recorded non-conformances relevant to the failure mode.A database search revealed one other complaint associated with the reported device lot that occurred during the same procedure with the same user; the other complaint is difficult removal of wire guide during the procedure that led to wire guide kinking.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu supplied with the device states the following in consideration of the reported failure mode: instructions for use: ¿4.-if resistance is encountered during wire guide insertion, do not force wire guide.¿ how supplied: ¿ upon removal from package, inspect the product to unsure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the available information, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, the cause of this event is component failure.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|