• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CIRCULATORY TECHNOLOGY, INC. THE BETTER BLADDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CIRCULATORY TECHNOLOGY, INC. THE BETTER BLADDER Back to Search Results
Model Number BB14
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/26/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
All better bladder units are visually inspected and tested during manufacturing prior to release.Testing includes a pull test and leak testing to verify a hermetic seal.The units met all acceptance criteria.Evaluation of retain samples confirmed the product complaint.The units were found to have insufficient adhesive applied during the assembly resulting in an ineffective seal between the pigtail and the housing port.At the time of this report, this issue has been detected in two manufacturing lots, lot 5290-201001 and 5290-210401.Both lots have been recalled.Root cause: insufficient adhesive.Correction/containment: recall and replace.Corrective actions: an additional step is being incorporated into the assembly of the bb14 and bbb38.Henceforth, additional adhesive will be applied to the external juncture between the pigtail and the housing port, the adhesive to cover at least 1/8" along the entire periphery of the external wall of housing and at least 1/8" along the entire periphery of the od of the pigtail.This enhancement would assure more adhesive, a post assembly visual observation of the adhesive and the additional sealing that has proved effective for the seal between the large tube and the housing, a seal that has that bead.Preventive actions: add pull gage with force requirement to the process specification.Add an in-process and finished product visual inspection of the glue bead around the pigtail.
 
Event Description
On 4/26/2021, cti was notified that the pigtail of bb14 (lot # 5290-201001) in a wet circuit readied for clinical use dislodged from the housing when pulled on.No patient was involved.The complainant stated that the facility did not leak test prior to use, as required in the ifu.On 5/17/21 the complainant called and informed cti that an additional unit from another lot, lot 5290-210401, failed the required leak test prior to use.This unit was not used on a patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THE BETTER BLADDER
Type of Device
BETTER BLADDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
CIRCULATORY TECHNOLOGY, INC.
21 singworth st
oyster bay NY 11771
Manufacturer (Section G)
CIRCULATORY TECHNOLOGY, INC.
21 singworth st.
oyster bay NY 11771
Manufacturer Contact
ayanna brown
21 singworth st.
oyster bay, NY 11771
4077580559
MDR Report Key11891459
MDR Text Key263498616
Report Number1000522036-2021-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTN
UDI-Device Identifier00851997007004
UDI-Public(01)00851997007004(10)5290-201001(17)20231021(11)20201021
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K981284
Number of Events Reported2
Summary Report (Y/N)Y
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/26/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/21/2023
Device Model NumberBB14
Device Catalogue NumberBB14
Device Lot Number5290-201001, 5290-210401
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/01/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/26/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/21/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-