• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PROLENE 3D PATCH MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PROLENE 3D PATCH MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Micturition Urgency (1871); Unspecified Infection (1930); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 10/25/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: int urogynecol j (2013); 24:963¿968.Doi 10.1007/s00192-012-1953-2.No additional information available.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Adverse events associated with tension free vaginal tape device reported via mw # 2210968-2021-05108.
 
Event Description
It was reported in a journal article with title: repeat versus primary slings in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency.The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the outcomes of repeat compared with primary slings in a cohort of patients with a urodynamic diagnosis of sui with isd.It was also our goal to determine any factors associated with an increased risk for sling failure, as well as any differences in outcomes between tension free trans-obturator and retropubic slings and tensioned pubovaginal slings.Between march 2003 to october 2010, a total of 637 female patients who underwent surgical treatment of sui with isd with a synthetic sling were included in the study.557 patients (mean age = 68.1±12.1 years; bmi = 27.4±5.1) had a primary sling placed, and 80 patients (mean age = 65.9±9.8 years; bmi = 26.9±4.8) underwent a repeat sling procedure for recurrent sui.Of the 637 slings, 132 (21 %) were tension-free mid-urethral trans-obturator slings (monarc), 174 (27 %) tension-free mid-urethral retropubic slings (anterior ivs and tvt (ethicon)), and 331 (52 %) tensioned pubovaginal slings placed at the bladder neck (prolene patch (ethicon) and i-stop).Reported complications included unsuccessful / not cured / failure (n=?) which required reintervention and underwent at least one in-office urethral bulking procedure during follow-up; subjective urgency/mui (n=?); de novo urgency (n=?); positive empty supine stress test (n=?); postoperative voiding dysfunction (n=?); bladder outlet obstruction (n=?) which required sling transection; infection of the synthetic sling or sutures (n=?) and underwent sling removal.In conclusion, in women with isd, repeat slings are associated with lower success rates compared with primary slings.Pubovaginal slings resulted in the highest success rate compared with both trans-obturator and retropubic slings.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROLENE 3D PATCH MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
J-PAC
25 centre road
somersworth NH 03878
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key11913109
MDR Text Key266909750
Report Number2210968-2021-05109
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K061533
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/04/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/01/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/04/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-