• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER BIOMET, INC. UNKNOWN ZPLP FIBULAR PLATE; PLATE, FIXATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER BIOMET, INC. UNKNOWN ZPLP FIBULAR PLATE; PLATE, FIXATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Naturally Worn (2988)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Report source: foreign: (b)(6).Citation : park, sung j., et al."metallosis after using distal fibular locking plate for lateral malleolar fractures: a retrospective study." orthopaedic surgery, 1 mar.2021, pp.1-7, doi:https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00402-020-03713-y.Reported event was unable to be confirmed due to limited information received from the customer.Device history record review was unable to be performed as the lot number of the device involved in the event is unknown.Root cause was unable to be determined as the necessary information to adequately investigate the reported event was not provided.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.Product not returned.
 
Event Description
The study reported 4 patients noted to have metallosis at the locking hole upon hardware removal; one of which was a (b)(6) year old female who received a 6 hole plate for a right trimalleolar fracture.A journal article was retrieved from archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2021) that reported a retrospective study from the republic of korea that looked at the development of metallosis following orif of fractures.The purpose of the study was to assess metallosis following orif using distal fibular locking plates to treat distal fibular fractures.The study reviewed 69 patients who underwent surgery using locking compression plates to treat lateral malleolar fractures with subsequent hardware removal; of these patients, 38 received a zplp plate (zimmer biomet), 16 received synthes lcp plates, and 15 received je-il arix plates.The surgeries were performed at inha university hospital (korea).Of the zplp recipients, 19 patients had unimalleolar fractures, 7 had bimalleolar fractures, and 12 had trimalleolar fractures; 2 patients were classified as weber type a, 31 were weber type b, and 5 were weber type c.The study population had a mean age of 49.3 years at time of surgery (range 18-70 years).Follow-up was conducted at approximately 4-5 times within the first year postoperatively with a mean length of follow-up for 13.92 months (range 12-31 months).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN ZPLP FIBULAR PLATE
Type of Device
PLATE, FIXATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER BIOMET, INC.
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER BIOMET, INC.
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key11948216
MDR Text Key254857002
Report Number0001822565-2021-01543
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/07/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/12/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
-
-