Manufacturing review: a device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately, one month twenty-five days of post deployment, computed tomography of chest with contrast revealed a small pulmonary embolism was identified in the right mainstem branches and leads to the right lower lobe.This embolus was largest in size on prior exam and may be residual emboli or possible new embolus.Vq scan revealed a new onset of right-side pulmonary embolism.There was a thrombus above the filter.Around, three months later, computed tomography of chest with contrast revealed possible for pulmonary embolism in the right lower lobar branch of the right pulmonary artery and possible in the posterior segmental branches of the left lower lobe.On the next day, computed tomography of chest showed and not clear if the pulmonary embolism was new or old.Around one year and three months later, chest x-ray revealed nonocclusive pulmonary embolus in the left lower lobe.On the same day, computed tomography of chest with contrast revealed intraluminal thrombus was identified in the pulmonary artery, extended to the left lower lobe.The filter was occluded.Around, one month later, computed tomography of chest with contrast revealed there are filling defects in the sub segmental and segmental pulmonary arteries of the left upper lobe and left lower lobe.Small filling defect in sub segmental pulmonary artery in the right lower lobe.After, eighteen days, computed tomography of chest with contrast revealed the pulmonary emboli identified on prior exam was no longer identified.A tiny residual thrombus was identified in an arterial branch of the left lower lobe.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the occlusion of the inferior vena cava (ivc).Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced pe post deployment and thrombus above the filter post deployment.However, the relationship to the filter is unknown.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter occluded.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The patient reportedly diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and experienced thrombus above the filter; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|