MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 97702 |
Device Problems
Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Electro-Static Discharge (2149)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Burning Sensation (2146); Electric Shock (2554); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 06/06/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that¿on (b)(6),¿ the patient's husband needed to shut patient's device off due to lightning storm that was close to their house.The lightning flashes were causing patient to report feeling "electrical pulses" in her hand.Stimulation therapy is for cervical placement.Technical services (tss) reviewed electrical pulses could be positional or electromagnetic interference (emi) related.This appears to be the first report by the husband since implant in (b)(6) 2021.Tss asked rep to find out if there have been any recent falls or trauma, if this has happened before.Suggested to monitor and have husband ask patient to move their head to different positions to see if that brings on the event again and monitor if there is another lightning storm again.Reviewed most conservative way to proceed if issues still happen during storm is to either turn down stim or turn therapy off until storm passes.Caller didn't have patient's settings to determine if close to patient's max threshold.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient's husband reported during the storms, patient was feeling electrical shocks in her hands and her neck heated up.Ins was turned off until storms passed.It was reported that since these episodes her stimulation levels have not worked properly as in not controlling her pain.It was reported that the defective ins has caused heating at electrode site and can result in tissue damage as well as could cause her death.It was reported that the defective device was causing the patient extreme mental distress, physical damage, pain and suffering.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
A date has not been scheduled for explant.They have been instructed to turn the stimulation off in the meantime.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that impedance checks were within normal limits.Rep had the patient rotate their head to various positions and learned that when they had their head facing down, the stimulation was too strong.Rep adjusted all three programs to a comfortable level with patient's head facing down.It was reported that the adjustments made to patient's device to c20 was only effective when they were at rest.During normal daily activities patient's neck pain accelerated where they had to increase it to c70.Yesterdays thunder and lightening storm the patient experienced electrical shocks to both hands.As patient's family/friend addressed the lightening storm, shocks had no effects since the implant.Only recently did it start.Patient was advised to call the office and schedule an explant.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|