• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-FEM-CELECT-PERM
Device Problem Structural Problem (2506)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Catalog # is unknown but referred to as gunther tulip.Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: the reported allegations have been investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava/aorta/artery perforation.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The following information is alleged: the patient received a celect inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2010, multiple prongs of the filter have perforated the ivc.One prong is perforating the aorta, a second prong is perforating the left common iliac artery.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2010 via the right common femoral vein due to pulmonary embolism (pe).The patient alleges organ perforation.The patient further alleges anxiety and worry.(b)(6) 2019, per a report from computed tomography; ¿an ivc filter inferior to the renal veins.The inferior aspect of the ivc is atrophic in appearance.No evidence of filter tilting.The four long struts are greater than 8mm beyond the ivc wall.One of the struts is eroding through peripheral aspect of the l3 vertebral body.¿.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: organ perforation, anxiety, worry, strut erosion.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The additional information regarding organ perforation does not change the previous investigation results for vena cava perforation.Unknown if the reported strut erosion, anxiety, worry are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK CELECT FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer Contact
lissi walmann
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov 
56868686
MDR Report Key12127430
MDR Text Key260230269
Report Number3002808486-2021-01472
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K073374
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/03/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/07/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/22/2012
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-FEM-CELECT-PERM
Device Lot NumberE2572089
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/03/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/22/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight129 KG
-
-