• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC TI PARALLEL OPEN ROD CNCTR 3.5MM/6.0MM ORTHOSIS, CERVICAL PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL FIXATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC TI PARALLEL OPEN ROD CNCTR 3.5MM/6.0MM ORTHOSIS, CERVICAL PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL FIXATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 498.924
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stenosis (2263); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # pc-(b)(4). If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank. Additional narrative: additional pro-codes: kwp, mnh, mni. Without a valid lot number the device history records review could not be completed. Complainant device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation. Initial reporter is j&j company representative. Musculoskeletal system. The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received. Investigation summary product was not returned. Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed. This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities. If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable. Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis. If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of a clinical evaluation report (cer) from a related research activity database (ddra) for patients undergoing cervical fusion. The following complications were reported as follows: readmission: neoplasm, benign, nos (1) -patient no. 686, 687,688, male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-t2 decompression for tumor resection and fusion with synapse instrumentation readmitted for neoplasm, benign, nos. Neoplasm, metastatic, brain/spinal cord (1) -patient no. 1165,1166,1167,1168,1169, female, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervicothoracic decompression fusion was readmitted for neoplasm, metastatic, brain/spinal cord. Stenosis, cervical spine (3) -patient (no. 1394,1395,1396,1397)female (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c5-c6, c6-7 discectomy and fusion with allograft and aviator plate was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine. -patient (no 1398,1399,1400) female (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c5-6, c6-7 discectomy and fusion with allograft and aviator plate was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine. -patient (no. 1401,1402,1403,1404,1405) female (b)(6) old who underwent anterior/posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine. Stenosis, cervicothoracic spine (1) -patient (no. 1410,1414,1413,1412,1411) female (b)(6) old who underwent anterior l3-s1 decompression fusion with vertigraft, possible infuse was readmitted due to stenosis, cervicothoracic spine. Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region (2) -patient (no. 913,914) female (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervical c5-6 decompression and fusion with synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region. -patient no. 220 male (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region. Other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region (4) -patient no 206 female (b)(6) old who underwent revision anterior c7 corpectomy was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. -patient no 366 male (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervical c2-7 decompression was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. -patient (no. 1031,1032,1033,1034,1035,1036)male (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c5-6, c6-7 decompression fusion with vg2 and maxan plate/posterior c2-t2 decompression fusion with synapse 4. 0 instrumentation(new aesculap retractor) was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. -patient no 345 female (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression f was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. Spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region (3) -patient no 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, female, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c3-7 decompression fusion with allograft/posterior c3-t1 fusion with synapse was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. -patient no 988, female, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c3-7 decompression fusion with allograft/posterior c3-t1 fusion with synapse was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. -patient no 1343, 1344, 1345, 1346, male, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior/posterior cervical decompression and fusion was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region. Spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic region (1) -patient no 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervical fusion c3-t2 was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic region. Radiculopathy, cervical region (1) -patient no 283 male (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c4-t1 decompression was readmitted due to radiculopathy, cervical region. Other cord compression (1) -patient no 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c2-6 decompression and fusion with synapse 4. 0 instrumentation was readmitted due to other cord compression. Myelopathy, nec (1) -patient no 1043, 1044, 1045, male ,(b)(6) old who underwent anterior/posterior cervical corpectomy and fusion; i and d; graft placement was readmitted due to myelopathy, nec. Connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral forami (1) -patient no 134, male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervical decompression was readmitted due to connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral forami. Other cervical disc displacement (1) -patient no 41, 42,female, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to other cervical disc displacement. Kyphosis, unspecified, cervical region (1) -patient no 1132, 1133, 1134, male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c2-4 fusion with 3. 5 synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to kyphosis, unspecified, cervical region. Postural kyphosis, cervicothoracic region (1) -patient no 373, 374, male, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to postural kyphosis, cervicothoracic region. Other postoperative infection (3) -patient no 1259, 1260, 1261, 1262, 1263 male (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression, c3-t2 fusion with synapse 4. 0 instrumentation was readmitted due to other postoperative infection. -patient no 1068, 1069, female, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c5-6 6-7 decompression and fusion with synthes synapse and small infuse kit was readmitted due to other postoperative infection. -patient no. 527, 528, 529, male, (b)(6) old who underwent c3-7 laminectomy , c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to other postoperative infection. Infection following a procedure, initial encounter (2) -patient no 33, 34, 35, 36 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervical c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to infection following a procedure, initial encounter. -patient no 168, 169, 170 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent minimally invasive posterior c was readmitted due to infection following a procedure, initial encounter. Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation (1) -patient no 177, 178, 179, 180, 181. Female, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c2-t1 fusion with sy was readmitted due to infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation. Pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis (5) -patient no 199 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c1-2 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis. -patient no 353 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent image guided revision posterior was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis. -patient no 414, 415 male (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis. -patient no 1323, 1324, 1325, 1326, 1327, female, (b)(6) old who underwent revision posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis. -patient no 209, female, (b)(6) old who underwent revision posterior c2-7 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis. Displacement of other internal orthopedic devices, implants (1) -patient no 61 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior posterior cervical th rod spinal 80mm 3. 5mm axon cur readmitted due to displacement of other internal orthopedic devices, implants. Other mechanical complication of other internal orthopedic device (1) -patient no. 145 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c3-6 decompression fu was readmitted due to other mechanical complication of other internal orthopedic device. Complication nec due to other internal orthopedic device (1) -patient no. 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042,female ,(b)(6) old who underwent anterior cervical c4-6 corpectomy with fibula allograft, posterior c3-t1 laminectomy and fusion with synapse 4. 0 instrumentation was readmitted due to complication nec due to other internal orthopedic device mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nec (1) -patient no 419 ,female, (b)(6) old ,who underwent removal of anterior bilateral was readmitted due to mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nec mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nos (1) -patient no 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086 ,female, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression, c3-t1 fusion with synapse 3. 5 instrument (latex allergy) was readmitted due to mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nos. Neuralgia/neuritis, nos (1) -patient no 683, 684, 685,male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to neuralgia/neuritis, nos. Spondylolisthesis, acquired (1) -patient no. 630, 631, 632, 633, 634 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression, c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to spondylolisthesis, acquired. Non-healing surgical wound (1) -patient no 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior c3-4, c4-5, c6-7 decompression and fusion with allograft, (no plate), posterior c3-7 laminectomy, c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse 4. 0 instrumentation was readmitted due to non-healing surgical wound. Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified (1) -patient no 1437 ,female, (b)(6) old who underwent occiput to c2 decompression and fusion was readmitted due to disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified. Nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage (1) -patient no 204 male (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage. Fx closed c3 vertebra (2) -patient no 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356,male ,(b)(6) old who underwent anterior c3-4, c4-5, c5-6, c6-7 decompression and fusion with allograft (no plate), posterior c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse 4. 0 was readmitted due to fx closed c3 vertebra. -patient no 1365, 1366, 1367 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent revision a/p cervical decompression/fusion was readmitted due to fx closed c3 vertebra. Fx closed c2 vertebra (1) -patient no 696, 697, 698, 699 ,female, (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c5-t1 decompression fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to fx closed c2 vertebra. Other fracture of first thoracic vertebra (1) -patient no 201 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent anterior/ posterior c4-7 dec was readmitted due to other fracture of first thoracic vertebra. Unstable burst fracture of first thoracic vertebra (1) -patient no 1447 ,male, (b)(6) old who underwent panendoscopy with poss neck exploration was readmitted due to unstable burst fracture of first thoracic vertebra. Removal of clik-x instrumentation (1) -patient no. 1286 (b)(6) old male had removal of l4-s1 clik-x instrumentation. -the following patient had removal of synapse system implants (6) patient no. 1063,1064, 1065,1066,1067 male (b)(6) old underwent posterior removal of synapse rods revision of t1 screws, placement of t2-t4 screws/anterior c6-7, c7-t1 fusion with allograft /posterior implantation of synapse rods -patient no. 980, 981 male (b)(6) old underwent posterior removal of synapse rods, revision of fusion to t4/anterior c7-t1 corpectomy fusion with tricortical allograft. Readmitted for myelopathy nec. -patient no. 475,476,477,478 female (b)(6) old underwent revision anterior/posterior decompression and fusion , removal of cslp plate and synapse instrumentation , re-instrumentation with atlantis and mountaineer vs. Cslp and synapse. -patient no. 584,585,586,587, female , (b)(6) old who underwent posterior c1-2 fusion with mountaineer , removal of synthes instrumentation. -patient no. 1076, (b)(6) female, revision of occiput-c4 fusion with revision of synthes synapse. -patient no. 975, (b)(6) female, removal of synapse c4-t1 rods. -the following had removal of cervifix implants (3) patient no. 483,484,485,486,487,488 male (b)(6) old underwent revision posterior c2-t2 fusion with synapse instrumentation and autograft (remove cervifix) -patient no. 1314 ,135,1316,1317,1318 , male (b)(6) old who underwent revison anterior c5-6 decompression fusion with allograft and vectra plate (remove synthes cslp) , posterior revision c2-t1 with synapse instrumentation (remove cervifix)s. -patient no. 1328,1329,1330 ,female, (b)(6) old, who underwent cervical decompression and fusion (no plate) , revision posterior cervical fusion with synthes synapse, removal of synthes cervifix screws the following had removal of cslp (3 refer to pt 475 and 1314 ) -patient no. 184 female (b)(6) old had removal anterior c3-7 cslp plate. This is for depuy synthes posterior cervical systems (synapse). This complaint involves 208 devices. Due to a limit of impacted products per complaint, this complaint will be captured under 11 separate complaints as listed below: pc-(b)(4) - this complaint will include 19 devices (1st pc). Pc-(b)(4)- this complaint will include 19 devices (2nd pc). This report is for one (1) ti parallel open rod cnctr 3. 5mm/6. 0mm this report is 20 of 20 for pc-(b)(4). A copy of the clinical evaluation form is being submitted with this regulatory report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NameTI PARALLEL OPEN ROD CNCTR 3.5MM/6.0MM
Type of DeviceORTHOSIS, CERVICAL PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL FIXATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 
MDR Report Key12134934
MDR Text Key277880747
Report Number2939274-2021-03491
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
UDI-Device Identifier10705034792163
UDI-Public(01)10705034792163
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PREADM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,study
Reporter Occupation
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/14/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/08/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator
Device Model Number498.924
Device Catalogue Number498.924
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional?
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received06/14/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unkown

Patient Treatment Data
Date Received: 07/08/2021 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-