Model Number FRED2508-PMA |
Device Problems
Collapse (1099); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problems
Paralysis (1997); Ischemia Stroke (4418); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
Event Date 06/21/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device remains impanted in the patient.Provided fluoroscopic images show the stent deployed as intended.Multiple images also show the device having migrated distally with part of the proximal end of the stent appearing to protrude into the body of the aneurysm.Additionally, the stent appears compressed in its mid section as reported in the complaint.The images confirm the complaint, but without the return and physical evaluation of the device, the investigation is unable to determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies device migration or misplacement, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke as potential complications associated with use of the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the fred 21 stent was used to treat a right mca (m1) aneurysm.The device was fully deployed into m1 fully covering the aneurysm with proximal flared ends into ica bifurcation.On subsequent run, it was noticed that the device had jumped distally and was no longer covering the aneurysm with proximal flared-end jumping into aneurysm.Clot formed in the center of the stent.Ia integrilin was administered, but did not seem to help.Physician tried to cross the stent to place another device within the first fred 21 but could not re-access the lumen possibly due to some sort of bunching in the center of the stent.Subsequent imaging showed abnormal appearances of the fred 21 device.Procedure was stopped and integrilin drip was started.Additional information received upon follow-up indicated the stent appeared collapsed at 5.4mm and clotted again.The patient had a stroke and is paralyzed on their left side.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: h6.H10: additional evaluation summary: based on bench-testing using vessel models and stent of similar sizes, the stent migration could have been a combination of insufficient oversizing of the stent, the effect of a bolus contrast that momentarily increased the diameter of the treated vessel, and lack of sufficient overlap at the proximal end of the stent that led to less than optimal radial force required for proper anchoring of the stent.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|