As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 09/2023).
|
H10: the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be no longer reportable.Since an initial mdr was submitted, therefore, the file will remain assessed as a malfunction.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: two electronic photos were provided for review.Two photos represent the wireform present in the needle having blood residue on it.It shows the presence of wireform in the needle.Therefore, based on the photo review, the reported failure separation could not be confirmed based on the provided photo.Therefore, the investigation for the reported separation failure is kept as inconclusive as there was no proper evident provided.One ultraclip dual trigger was returned for evaluation.On visual evaluation, the device appeared to have blood residue and it was noted that the wireform was not returned.And it was further noted the needle was found to be bent and blunt.Due to the nature of the condition, functional evaluation cannot be done.Therefore, the investigation for the reported separation failure is kept as inconclusive as the functional evaluation is not done.A definitive root cause for the alleged separation failure could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 09/2023),.
|